- Full text:
- PDF (1003 kB)
The adsorption of atomic hydrogen on a rutile TiO2(110) surface was investigated by nuclear reaction analysis (NRA), ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), and conductivity measurements. The TiO2(110) surface was annealed in O2 of 1 × 10−4 Pa, which is regarded as a quasi-stoichiometric surface. After exposure to atomic hydrogen, UPS showed a localized in-gap state (IGS) at about 0.8 eV below the Fermi level and downward band bending with a decrease in the work function. Along with these changes, the conductivity was increased by 2.9 µS/□. Our results indicate that hydrogen donates electrons to the substrate. The amount of charge transfer and electric conductivity are discussed on the basis of the experimental data.
References
- 1 Ç. Kılıç and A. Zunger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 73 (2002). 10.1063/1.1482783 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 2 C. G. Van de Walle and J. Neugebauer, Nature 423, 626 (2003). 10.1038/nature01665 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 3 A. Fujishima and K. Honda, Nature 238, 37 (1972). 10.1038/238037a0 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 4 A. L. Linsebigler, G. Lu, and J. T. Yates, Jr., Chem. Rev. 95, 735 (1995). 10.1021/cr00035a013 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 5 U. Diebold, Surf. Sci. Rep. 48, 53 (2003). 10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 6 C. L. Pang, R. Lindsay, and G. Thornton, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 2328 (2008). 10.1039/b719085a Crossref, Google Scholar
- 7 M. A. Henderson, Surf. Sci. Rep. 66, 185 (2011). 10.1016/j.surfrep.2011.01.001 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 8 C. L. Pang, R. Lindsay, and G. Thornton, Chem. Rev. 113, 3887 (2013). 10.1021/cr300409r Crossref, Google Scholar
- 9 O. K. Varghese, D. Gong, M. Paulose, K. G. Ong, and C. A. Grimes, Sens. Actuators B 93, 338 (2003). 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00222-3 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 10 C. Lu and Z. Chen, Sens. Actuators B 140, 109 (2009). 10.1016/j.snb.2009.04.004 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 11 M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, A. Hofmann, and J. Sauer, Surf. Sci. Rep. 62, 219 (2007). 10.1016/j.surfrep.2007.03.002 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 12 V. E. Henrich, G. Dresselhaus, and H. J. Zeiger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1335 (1976). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1335 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 13 R. L. Kurtz, R. Stock-Bauer, T. E. Madey, E. Roman, and J. L. De Segovia, Surf. Sci. 218, 178 (1989). 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90626-2 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 14 W. S. Epling, C. H. F. Peden, M. A. Henderson, and U. Diebold, Surf. Sci. 412–413, 333 (1998). 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00446-4 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 15 J. Leconte, A. Markovits, M. K. Skalli, C. Minot, and A. Belmajdoub, Surf. Sci. 497, 194 (2002). 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01477-7 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 16 M. Menetrey, A. Markovits, and C. Minot, Surf. Sci. 524, 49 (2003). 10.1016/S0039-6028(02)02464-0 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 17 P. M. Kowalski, B. Meyer, and D. Marx, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115410 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115410 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 18 C. Di Valentin, G. Pacchioni, and A. Selloni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 166803 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.166803 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 19 V. E. Henrich and R. L. Kurtz, Phys. Rev. B 23, 6280 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.6280 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 20 W. Göpel, G. Rocker, and R. Feierabend, Phys. Rev. B 28, 3427 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.3427 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 21 J. M. Pan, B. L. Maschhoff, U. Diebold, and T. E. Madey, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 2470 (1992). 10.1116/1.577986 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 22 S. Suzuki, K.-I. Fukui, H. Onishi, and Y. Iwasawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2156 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2156 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 23 M. Kunat, U. Burghaus, and C. Wöll, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 4203 (2004). 10.1039/b404629c Crossref, Google Scholar
- 24 X.-L. Yin, M. Calatayud, H. Qiu, Y. Wang, A. Birkner, C. Minot, and C. Wöll, ChemPhysChem 9, 253 (2008). 10.1002/cphc.200700612 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 25 G. H. Enevoldsen, H. P. Pinto, A. S. Foster, M. C. R. Jensen, W. A. Hofer, B. Hammer, J. V. Lauritsen, and F. Besenbacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136103 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.136103 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 26 Z. Wu, W. Zhang, F. Xiong, Q. Yuan, Y. Jin, J. Yang, and W. Huang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 7051 (2014). 10.1039/C4CP00697F Crossref, Google Scholar
- 27 K. Fukutani, H. Iwai, Y. Murata, and H. Yamashita, Phys. Rev. B 59, 13020 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.13020 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 28 M. Wilde and K. Fukutani, Surf. Sci. Rep. 69, 196 (2014). 10.1016/j.surfrep.2014.08.002 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 29 M. Li, W. Hebenstreit, U. Diebold, A. M. Tyryshkin, M. K. Bowman, G. G. Dunham, and M. A. Henderson, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 4944 (2000). 10.1021/jp9943272 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 30 J. Tao, Q. Cuan, X.-q. Gong, and M. Batzill, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 20438 (2012). 10.1021/jp3064678 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 31 F. Filippone, G. Mattioli, P. Alippi, and A. Amore Bonapasta, Phys. Rev. B 80, 245203 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.245203 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 32 J. Pascual, J. Camassel, and H. Mathieu, Phys. Rev. B 18, 5606 (1978). 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.5606 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 33 I. G. Austin and N. F. Mott, Adv. Phys. 50, 757 (2001). 10.1080/00018730110103249 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 34 N. A. Deskins and M. Dupuis, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195212 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.195212 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 35 G. Mattioli, P. Alippi, F. Filippone, R. Caminiti, and A. A. Bonapasta, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 21694 (2010). 10.1021/jp1041316 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 36 M. Setvin, C. Franchini, X. Hao, M. Schmid, A. Janotti, M. Kaltak, C. G. Van de Walle, G. Kresse, and U. Diebold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 086402 (2014). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.086402 Crossref, Google Scholar
- 37 E. Yagi, R. R. Hasiguti, and M. Aono, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7945 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.7945 Crossref, Google Scholar