J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 084602 (2017) [9 Pages]
FULL PAPERS

Orders Exhibited by Ensemble of Headless Spins Preferring Twisted Alignment: Phase Diagram of Extended Maier–Saupe Model on Simple Cubic Lattice

+ Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan

The effect of the preference for nonparallel alignment without a preferred twist sense of neighboring headless spins is examined through computer simulations on extended Maier–Saupe models on the simple cubic lattice with/without next-nearest-neighbor interactions. Phase diagrams containing four phases are constructed for a varying degree of the preference for the local twist and for a strength of the next-nearest-neighbor interaction. It is shown that the preference for the local twist brings about not only the instability for the nematic (uniaxial) order but also that for a spatial order to reduce the frustration arising from the local twist. The next-nearest-neighbor interaction can produce even a weak spatial order of local chirality. The results are discussed in relation to the formation of a liquid crystalline gyroid phase and chiral phases in ensembles consisting of antispindle molecules that are axially symmetric and achiral.

©2017 The Physical Society of Japan

References

  • 1 W. Maier and A. Saupe, Z. Naturforsch. A 13, 564 (1958). Google Scholar
  • 2 P. A. Lebwohl and Q. Lasher, Phys. Rev. A 6, 426 (1972). 10.1103/PhysRevA.6.426 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 H. Meirovitch, Chem. Phys. 21, 251 (1977). 10.1016/0301-0104(77)80019-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 P. G. de Genne and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1993) 2nd ed. Google Scholar
  • 5 R. L. Humphries, P. G. James, and G. R. Luckhurst, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. II 68, 1031 (1972). 10.1039/f29726801031 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Y. R. Lin-Liu, Y. M. Shih, and C.-W. Woo, Phys. Rev. A 15, 2550 (1977). 10.1103/PhysRevA.15.2550 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 C. Dressel, F. Liu, M. Prehm, X. Zeng, G. Ungar, and C. Tschierske, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 53, 13115 (2014). 10.1002/anie.201406907 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 C. Dressel, T. Reppe, M. Perhm, M. Brautzsch, and C. Tschierske, Nat. Chem. 6, 971 (2014). 10.1038/nchem.2039 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 C. Tschierske and G. Ungar, ChemPhysChem 17, 9 (2016). 10.1002/cphc.201500601 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 S. Kutsumizu, S. Miisako, Y. Miwa, M. Kitagawa, Y. Yamamura, and K. Saito, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 17341 (2016). 10.1039/C6CP02954J CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 J.-P. Lü and Q.-H. Chen, Commun. Theor. Phys. 57, 166 (2012). 10.1088/0253-6102/57/1/26 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 G. A. Canova, Y. Levin, and J. J. Arenzon, Phys. Rev. E 94, 032140 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032140 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953). 10.1063/1.1699114 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 C. Dasgupta and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1556 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1556 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 A. Yoshimori, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 14, 807 (1959). 10.1143/JPSJ.14.807 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16 S. Hyde, S. Andersson, K. Larsson, Z. Blum, T. Landh, S. Lidin, and B. W. Ninham, The Language of Shape (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997). Google Scholar
  • 17 Y. Nakazawa, Y. Yamamura, S. Kutsumizu, and K. Saito, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 094601 (2012). 10.1143/JPSJ.81.094601 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18 K. Saito, Y. Yamamura, Y. Miwa, and S. Kutsumizu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 3280 (2016). 10.1039/C5CP06658A CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 S. Kutsumizu, H. Mori, M. Fukatami, S. Naito, K. Sakajiri, and K. Saito, Chem. Mater. 20, 3675 (2008). 10.1021/cm703684v CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Y. Onodera, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 1477 (1970). 10.1143/PTP.44.1477 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 K. Saito, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 3137 (1998). 10.1143/JPSJ.67.3137 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22 I. W. Hamley, The Physics of Block Copolymers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 1998). Google Scholar
  • 23 Handbook of Liquid Crystals Vol. 5 Non-Conventional Liquid Crystals, ed. J. W. Goodby, P. J. Collings, T. Kato, C. Tschierske, H. F. Gleeson, and P. Raynes (Wiley, Weinheim, 2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 A. M. F. Neto and S. R. A. Salinas, The Physics of Lyotropic Liquid Crystals (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2005). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 H. Jinnai, T. Kajihara, H. Watashiba, Y. Nishikawa, and R. J. Spontak, Phys. Rev. E 64, 010803(R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.010803 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 L. Leibler, Macromolecules 13, 1602 (1980). 10.1021/ma60078a047 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 T. Ohta and K. Kawasaki, Macromolecules 19, 2621 (1986). 10.1021/ma00164a028 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 M. W. Matsen and F. S. Bates, Macromolecules 29, 1091 (1996). 10.1021/ma951138i CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 V. E. Podneks and I. W. Hamley, JETP Lett. 64, 617 (1996). 10.1134/1.567271 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 L. J. Ellison, D. J. Michel, F. Barmes, and D. J. Cleaver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 237801 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.237801 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 K. Saito, Y. Yamamura, and S. Kutsumizu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 093601 (2008). 10.1143/JPSJ.77.093601 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 32 A. I. Kitaigorodsky, Molecular Crystals and Molecules (Academic Press, New York, 1973). Google Scholar
  • 33 CSD Space Group Statistics 2015, the statistics of the Cambridge Structural Database as of November 6, 2015, available at http://ccdc.cam.ac.uk (The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre). Google Scholar