J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 051013 (2020) [6 Pages]
SPECIAL TOPICS: Frontier of Hydrogen Science

Hydrogen at Electrochemical Interfaces

+ Affiliations
The Institute for Solid State Physics, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan

At the electrode–electrolyte interface, hydrogen shows peculiar behavior being influenced by the dipole layer called Helmholtz layer. For the understanding of this system, first-principles methods have been intensively developed and applied to the benchmarking interface like Pt(111)-water; however, controversy still exists even on the hydrogen adsorption although being the simplest and most-studied problem. After giving introductory explanation of the electrochemical interface and reaction, we briefly review the advance of the theory. It has been revealed that the typical density functional calculations are occasionally not accurate enough and need to advance the description of electron correlation and nuclear quantum effect. The advanced calculation shows a promise of elucidating some experimental data providing therewith further theoretical challenges.

©2020 The Physical Society of Japan

References

  • 1 V. Hacker and S. Mitsushima, Fuel Cells and Hydrogen: From Fundamentals to Applied Research (Elsevier, New York, 2018). Google Scholar
  • 2 N. M. Marković and P. N. Ross, Surf. Sci. Rep. 45, 117 (2002). 10.1016/S0167-5729(01)00022-X CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 O’M. Bockris and S. U. M. Kahn, Surface Electrochemistry: A Molecular Level Approach (Plenum, New York, 1993). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 M. Gouy, J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 9, 457 (1910). 10.1051/jphystap:019100090045700 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 D. L. Chapman, Philos. Mag. 25, 475 (1913). 10.1080/14786440408634187 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 M. Otani and O. Sugino, Phys. Rev. B 73, 115407 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115407 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 M. Otani, I. Hamada, O. Sugino, Y. Morikawa, Y. Okamoto, and T. Ikeshoji, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 024802 (2008). 10.1143/JPSJ.77.024802 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 N. Bonnet, T. Morishita, O. Sugino, and M. Otani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 266101 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.266101 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 D. Chandler and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 1930 (1972). 10.1063/1.1678513 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 A. Kovalenko and F. Hirata, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 10095 (1999). 10.1063/1.478883 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 S. Nishihara and M. Otani, Phys. Rev. B 96, 115429 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.115429 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 M. M. Melander, M. J. Kuisma, T. E. K. Christensen, and K. Honkala, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 041706 (2019). 10.1063/1.5047829 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  •   (13) Repulsion between solute molecules missing in the Poisson–Boltzmann, or the steric effect, is considered in modified Poisson–Boltzmann models. Google Scholar
  • 14 R. Jinnouchi and A. B. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B 77, 245417 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.245417 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 G. Fisicaro, L. Genovese, O. Andreussi, N. Marzari, and S. Goedecker, J. Chem. Phys. 144, 014103 (2016). 10.1063/1.4939125 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 S. Ringe, H. Oberhofer, and K. Reuter, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 134103 (2017). 10.1063/1.4978850 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 J. Haruyama, T. Ikeshoji, and M. Otani, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 095801 (2018). 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.095801 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Y. Ando, Y. Gohda, and S. Tsuneyuki, Chem. Phys. Lett. 556, 9 (2013). 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.11.062 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 D. L. Doering and T. E. Madey, Surf. Sci. 123, 305 (1982). 10.1016/0039-6028(82)90331-4 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 H. Ogasawara, B. Brena, D. Nordlund, M. Nyberg, A. Pelmenschikov, L. G. Pettersson, and A. Nilsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 276102 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.276102 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 G. A. Kimmel, N. G. Petrik, Z. Dohnálek, and B. D. Kay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 166102 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.166102 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 M. Otani, I. Hamada, O. Sugino, Y. Morikawa, Y. Okamoto, and T. Ikeshoji, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 3609 (2008). 10.1039/b803541e CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 I. Ledezma-Yanez, W. D. Z. Wallace, P. Sebastián-Pascual, V. Climent, J. M. Feliu, and M. T. M. Koper, Nat. Energy 2, 17031 (2017). 10.1038/nenergy.2017.31 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 C. Batchelor-McAuley, E. Kätelhön, E. O. Barnes, R. G. Compton, E. Laborda, and A. Molina, ChemistryOpen 4, 224 (2015). 10.1002/open.201500042 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 G. S. Karlberg, T. F. Jaramillo, E. Skúlason, J. Rossmeisl, T. Bligaard, and J. K. Nørskov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 126101 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.126101 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Y. W. Li and M. J. Janik, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 14, 124 (2019). 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.01.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 G. Jerkiewicz, Electrocatalysis 1, 179 (2010). 10.1007/s12678-010-0022-1 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 A. Lasia, J. Electroanal. Chem. 562, 23 (2004). 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.07.033 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 A. M. Gómez-Marín and E. A. Ticianelli, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 9, 129 (2018). 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 T. T. T. Hanh, Y. Takimoto, and O. Sugino, Surf. Sci. 625, 104 (2014). 10.1016/j.susc.2014.03.006 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 A. R. Zeradjanin, J.-P. Grote, G. Polymeros, and K. J. J. Mayrhofer, Electroanalysis 28, 2256 (2016). 10.1002/elan.201600270 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 T. L. Tan, L. L. Wang, D. D. Johnson, and K. W. Bai, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 22696 (2013). 10.1021/jp405760z CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 A. Tadjeddine and A. Peremans, Surf. Sci. 368, 377 (1996). 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)01079-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 H. Ogasawara and M. Ito, Chem. Phys. Lett. 221, 213 (1994). 10.1016/0009-2614(94)00247-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 K. Kunimatsu, T. Senzaki, G. Samjeske, M. Tsushima, and M. Osawa, Electrochim. Acta 52, 5715 (2007). 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 P. J. Feibelman, B. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov, F. Wagner, M. Scheffler, R. Stumpf, R. Watwe, and J. Dumesic, J. Chem. Phys. B 105, 4018 (2001). 10.1021/jp002302t CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 L. Schimka, J. Harl, A. Stroppa, A. Grüneis, M. Marsman, M. F. Mittendorfer, and G. Kresse, Nat. Mater. 9, 741 (2010). 10.1038/nmat2806 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 L. Yan, Y. Sun, Y. Yamamoto, S. Kasamatsu, I. Hamada, and O. Sugino, J. Chem. Phys. 149, 164702 (2018). 10.1063/1.5050830 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 L. Yan, Y. Yamamoto, M. Shiga, and O. Sugino, unpublished. Google Scholar
  • 40 D. Marx and M. Parrinello, Z. Phys. B 95, 143 (1994). 10.1007/BF01312185 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 See the review M. Nishijima, H. Okuyama, N. Takagi, T. Aruga, and W. Brenig, Surf. Sci. Rep. 57, 113 (2005), and references therein. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.03.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 C.-H. Hsu, B. E. Larson, M. El-Batanouny, C. R. Willis, and K. M. Martini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3164 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3164 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 K. Sakaushi, A. Lyalin, T. Taketsugu, and K. Uosaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 236001 (2018). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.236001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 C. Z. Zheng, C. K. Yeung, M. M. T. Loy, and X. D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 166101 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.166101 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 R. Jinnouchi and A. B. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 8747 (2008). 10.1021/jp802627s CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 H. A. Asiri and A. B. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 17509 (2013). 10.1021/jp401909n CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 E. Skúlason, G. S. Karlberg, J. Rossmeisl, T. Bligaard, J. Greeley, H. Jonsson, and J. K. Nørskov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 3241 (2007). 10.1039/B700099E CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 48 P. S. Rice, Y. Mao, C. X. Guo, and P. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 5932 (2019). 10.1039/C8CP07511E CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Y. Kim, S. Shin, and H. Kang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 54, 7626 (2015). 10.1002/anie.201500410 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Y. Kim, C. Noh, Y. Jung, and H. Kang, Chem.—Eur. J. 23, 17566 (2017). 10.1002/chem.201703882 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51 M. Pavese, D. R. Berard, and G. A. Voth, Chem. Phys. Lett. 300, 93 (1999). 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)01326-8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar