J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 074702 (2020) [8 Pages]
FULL PAPERS

Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Interaction between Multipolar Moments in 5d1 Systems

+ Affiliations
1Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan2Department of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan

We propose a new type of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) interactions which act on high-rank multipolar moments such as quadrupolar and octupolar moments. Here we consider 5d1 systems with broken spatial inversion symmetry, where the interplay of electron correlation, the spin–orbit coupling, and inversion symmetry breaking plays crucial roles. Using a numerical diagonalization on a two-site multi-orbital Hubbard model, we reveal that anti-symmetric products of multipole operators have finite expectation values, indicating the existence of DM interactions for multipoles. We also find that the spin–orbit coupling dependences of DM interactions for multipoles are significantly different depending on the lattice structure. Finally, we discuss the numerical results for small and large spin–orbit coupling region by using perturbative analysis.

©2020 The Physical Society of Japan

References

  • 1 B. J. Kim, H. Jin, S. J. Moon, J.-Y. Kim, B.-G. Park, C. S. Leem, J. Yu, T. W. Noh, C. Kim, S.-J. Oh, J.-H. Park, V. Durairaj, G. Cao, and E. Rotenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076402 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.076402 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017205 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Y. Singh and P. Gegenwart, Phys. Rev. B 82, 064412 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.064412 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 H. Matsuura and M. Ogata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 093701 (2014). 10.7566/JPSJ.83.093701 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 S. Sugano, Y. Tanabe, and H. Kamimura, Multiplets of Transition-Metal Ions in Crystals (Academic Press, New York, 1970). Google Scholar
  • 7 W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 57 (2014). 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125138 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 195 (2016). 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031115-011319 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 G. Chen, R. Pereira, and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174440 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174440 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 A. S. Erickson, S. Misra, G. J. Miller, R. R. Gupta, Z. Schlesinger, W. A. Harrison, J. M. Kim, and I. R. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 016404 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.016404 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 I. Dzyaloshinsky, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958). 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 T. Moriya, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960). 10.1103/PhysRev.120.91 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 T. Koretsune, T. Kikuchi, and R. Arita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 041011 (2018). 10.7566/JPSJ.87.041011 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 G. Chen and L. Balents, Phys. Rev. B 78, 094403 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.094403 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 R. Shindou, Phys. Rev. B 93, 094419 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.094419 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 T. Mizoguchi, K. Hwang, E. K.-H. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 94, 064416 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.064416 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 N. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. B 94, 174416 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.174416 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 M. Onoda and N. Nagaosa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 19 (2002). 10.1143/JPSJ.71.19 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Y. Yanase, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 044711 (2013). 10.7566/JPSJ.82.044711 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 20 T. Mizoguchi and N. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. B 93, 041304(R) (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.041304 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954). 10.1103/PhysRev.94.1498 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 R. Shiina, O. Sakai, H. Shiba, and P. Thalmeier, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 941 (1998). 10.1143/JPSJ.67.941 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23 P. Santini, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 807 (2009). 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.807 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 H. Matsuura and K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 073703 (2013). 10.7566/JPSJ.82.073703 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 25 V. V. Laguta, M. I. Zaritskii, M. D. Glinchuk, and I. P. Bykov, Phys. Rev. B 58, 156 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.156 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. B 90, 024432 (2014). 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024432 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 T. Hitomi and Y. Yanase, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 114704 (2014). 10.7566/JPSJ.83.114704 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28 S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. B 97, 024414 (2018). 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.024414 CrossrefGoogle Scholar